Biography
CT-UT復習範囲、CT-UT資格問題集
ほとんどの人は時間を節約するために速達を使用する傾向があるため、CT-UT準備試験は購入後5〜10分以内に送信されます。プラットフォームで料金を支払う限り、指定された時間内に関連する試験資料をメールボックスに配信します。当社はサービス全体を非常に重視しており、CT-UT試験資料の配信に問題がある場合：ISTQB Certified Tester Usability Tester、お知らせください。メッセージまたは電子メールを利用できます。
ISTQB CT-UT 認定試験の出題範囲：
トピック
出題範囲
トピック 1
- Usability and Accessibility Standards: This part addresses the knowledge required by Compliance Officers regarding standards and guidelines that govern usability and accessibility. It introduces ISO standards like ISO 9241-110 and ISO 9241-171, manufacturer guidelines from major platforms, and web accessibility guidelines such as WCAG. It also touches on legislation relevant to accessibility requirements, such as the UK Equality Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act.
トピック 2
- Selecting Appropriate Methods: This domain helps Test Managers make decisions on which usability evaluation methods to apply depending on project context, resources, and maturity. It discusses criteria for selecting usability, user experience, and accessibility evaluation methods suited to different stages of development and organizational needs, including agile development scenarios.
トピック 3
- User Surveys: This part assesses the ability of Usability Test Analysts to design and use surveys to gather user feedback on software usability. It describes how to prepare user surveys, select appropriate questionnaires, and analyze survey responses to measure user satisfaction and other quality attributes from the user’s perspective.
トピック 4
- Usability Testing: This section measures the practical knowledge of Usability Testers in planning, conducting, analyzing, and reporting formal usability test sessions with users. It outlines test preparation activities including writing test plans, test scripts, and tasks, as well as considerations for test locations and pilot sessions. It explains how to moderate sessions, analyze findings, classify problems by severity, and communicate results effectively to stakeholders.
トピック 5
- Risks in Usability, User Experience and Accessibility: This domain assesses the ability of Risk Analysts to identify and analyze common risks that can affect usability, user experience, and accessibility. It differentiates between product risks—such as users being unable to use a product effectively—and project risks, including lack of expertise or insufficient usability evaluation processes. Understanding these risks helps in planning effective usability testing and evaluation.
トピック 6
- Usability Reviews: This domain evaluates the skills of Usability Testers in conducting reviews of software interfaces without user involvement. It differentiates informal reviews from expert reviews and introduces heuristic evaluation as a structured method. The section describes step-by-step approaches to preparing for and conducting reviews, emphasizing the importance of consensus and clear communication of findings.
>> CT-UT復習範囲 <<
CT-UT ISTQB Certified Tester Usability Tester学習ガイド、CT-UT問題集参考書、CT-UT最新参考書
調査、研究を経って、IT職員の月給の増加とジョブのプロモーションはISTQB CT-UT資格認定と密接な関係があります。給料の増加とジョブのプロモーションを真になるために、Xhs1991のISTQB CT-UT問題集を勉強しましょう。いつまでもCT-UT試験に準備する皆様に便宜を与えるXhs1991は、高品質の試験資料と行き届いたサービスを提供します。
ISTQB Certified Tester Usability Tester 認定 CT-UT 試験問題 (Q32-Q37):
質問 # 32
What's the difference between an informal usability review and an expert usability review?
- A. An informal review only requires one reviewer
- B. An expert usability review is a formal review, not an informal review
- C. No formal usability qualifications are required for an informal usability review
- D. Contrary to an expert review, an informal usability review is based on opinion
正解：C
解説：
An informal usability review can be conducted by anyone, including stakeholders or developers, and does not require formal usability training or qualifications. It is typically subjective and based on general impressions.
In contrast, an expert usability review (also called heuristic evaluation) is conducted by a trained usability expert who applies recognized usability principles. This is what differentiates the two approaches most clearly. Options A and C are misleading; expert reviews can be informal in format, and informal reviews aren't necessarily based solely on opinion. Option D is incorrect since both informal and expert reviews can be conducted individually or in groups.
References:
Nielsen Norman Group: Heuristic Evaluation
ISO 9241-110:2020 - Interaction Principles
Usability.gov: Expert Review vs Informal Review
#######################################################
質問 # 33
You're asked to evaluate the direct interaction between ordinary users and the software product. Which kinds of evaluations would be suited for that?
- A. Usability maturity assessment
- B. Accessibility evaluation
- C. Risk assessment
- D. Usability evaluation
正解：D
解説：
A usability evaluation is specifically designed to assess how real users interact with a software product. It focuses on effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction in completing tasks. This may involve usability testing, expert reviews, or heuristic evaluations. The goal is to identify any usability problems and understand user behavior during real use.
Option A (Accessibility evaluation) targets inclusivity for users with disabilities, not general user interaction.
Option B (Usability maturity assessment) evaluates the organization's usability practices, and Option C (Risk assessment) evaluates potential project or system risks. Only option D directly involves observing and measuring user interaction.
References:
ISO 9241-11:2018 - Usability Definitions and Concepts
Usability.gov: Usability Evaluation Basics
Nielsen Norman Group: Types of Usability Evaluations
#######################################################
質問 # 34
A "usability requirement" is:
- A. A requirement needed to define the size of a mobile phone used in a usability test
- B. A requirement on the usability of a component or system
- C. A requirement how to conduct a usability test
- D. A requirement needed for a usability tester
正解：B
解説：
A usability requirement specifies how usable a product or component must be, often in terms of effectiveness, efficiency, and user satisfaction, as defined in ISO 9241-11. These requirements ensure that the product meets specific human-centered design goals, such as allowing users to complete tasks accurately and quickly.
Options A and C describe procedural or test setup elements, not actual usability requirements. Option B refers to personnel qualifications, which are not the same as usability requirements related to system behavior or performance.
References:
ISO 9241-11:2018 - Usability: Definitions and Concepts
ISO/IEC 25010:2011 - Product Quality Model (Usability as a quality characteristic) Usability.gov: Defining Usability Requirements
#######################################################
質問 # 35
A large customer complained that a business application developed by your company sometimes transfers the wrong amount of money to clients, although there are no complaints of the actual users. The expected amount differs from the actually transferred amount by a factor of 10 or 100. After analyzing the log files, you found out that the application itself works fine. The problem seems to be caused by confusing text fields and labels for the decimal place, leading to user errors.
Which usability risk should be reasonably addressed for the next release?
- A. Users won't buy or use the software product because it lacks effectiveness, efficiency or satisfaction
- B. Users resist using a software product which is essential for their daily work because it lacks usability
- C. Increased liability through risk to financial loss caused by a poorly designed or deceptive user interface
- D. Users buy the software product but repeatedly need to call support because they don't understand how to use it
正解：C
解説：
The scenario describes a situation where the interface misleads users into making serious financial mistakes due to poor design, such as confusing decimal separators. Even though the system functions correctly, it facilitates critical user errors. This constitutes a major usability risk with potential legal and financial consequences. Therefore, the correct risk to address is increased liability due to financial loss caused by a poorly designed or deceptive interface (option D). The other options focus on usability-related dissatisfaction, resistance, or lack of adoption, which are not the key concern in this scenario.
References:
ISO 9241-210:2019 - Risk Management in Usability Engineering
Nielsen Norman Group: Error Prevention in UI Design
IEEE 1028: Standard for Software Reviews and Risk-Based Usability
#######################################################
質問 # 36
In a short conversation, a potential customer mentions that accessibility is of great importance to them. What does this mean?
- A. They use prototyping in their development process
- B. They also seek to address users with limitations
- C. They focus on quantitative usability evaluations
- D. They focus on agile development
正解：B
解説：
When a customer emphasizes the importance of accessibility, it means they are concerned with ensuring that users with disabilities or limitations are not excluded from using their products or services. Accessibility is about inclusiveness-providing equal access and opportunity to all users regardless of physical or cognitive ability. Option C directly reflects this understanding. The other options (A, B, and D) are aspects of usability or development methodologies but do not relate to addressing the needs of users with disabilities, which is the core focus of accessibility.
References:
W3C: Accessibility Fundamentals
ISO 9241-171 and 210 - Accessibility and Human-Centered Design
ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) in Digital Accessibility Contexts
質問 # 37
......
すべての働く人は、CT-UTがこの分野で支配的な人物であり、また彼らのキャリアに役立つことを知っています。 CT-UT信頼性の高い試験ブートキャンプが試験に合格し、資格証明書を取得するのに役立つ場合、より良いキャリア、より良い人生を得ることができます。 私たちの研究CT-UTガイド資料は、最新のCT-UTテストの質問と回答のほとんどを網羅しています。 確かにこの分野で何か違うことをしようと決心しているなら、役に立つ認定はあなたのキャリアの足がかりになるでしょう。
CT-UT資格問題集: https://www.xhs1991.com/CT-UT.html
